On the use of feedback strategies in the detection of events in video surveillance

Juan Carlos San Miguel Avedillo and Jose M. Martinez
email: {JuanCarlos.SanMiguel, JoseM.Martinez} at uam.es

Video Processing and Understanding Lab (http://www-vpu.ii.uam.es/)
Escuela Politecnica Superior (http://www.ii.uam.es/)
Universidad Autonoma de Madrid (http://www.uam.es/)

Abstract
Selected Test Sequences
Results (video clips)

Abstract

In this work an approach for detecting video events in surveillance video is proposed. It is based on the use of feedback strategies between the signal processing stages of a typical video surveillance system to increase the performance of the event detection stage and to reduce the computational cost in easy/simple situations. Specifically, these feedback strategies are applied to change the output quality of the analysis stages as an increase/decrease in the level of detail of their analysis. Feedback information is based on performance measures computed in the different analysis stages of the system. Experimental results show that the proposed approach increases the detection reliability and reduces the computational cost as compared to the initially developed surveillance system across a variety of multiple video surveillance scenarios operating at real-time.

Selected Test Sequences

Experiments were carried out on several sequences from PETS2006 dataset [1], PETS2007 dataset [2], i-LIDS dataset for AVSS2007 [3], VISOR dataset [4], CANDELA dataset [5], WCAM dataset [6] and ChromaVSG dataset [7]. A more detailed description can be downloaded here.

Results (video clips)

Sequence Cat. Analysis Results Improvement with feedback strategies Scene Description
No feedback strategies Using Feedback strategies Computation Cost Reduction Score Improvement of True Positives Rejection of False Positives

Video Clip 1

1

VideoFile-3.4MB  

VideoFile-3.4MB  

Yes

Yes Yes A single person leaves and object on the floor

Video Clip 2

2

VideoFile-3.8MB  

VideoFile-4.4MB  

Yes Yes - A single person enter in the scene and leaves a small object in the floor

Video Clip 3

2

VideoFile-15.3MB 

VideoFile-18.5MB  

Yes Yes -

A single person enter in the scene, picks an object and leaves the scene.

Video Clip 4

2

VideoFile-14MB  

VideoFile-11MB  

Yes Yes No (due to their high initial probability)

A single person enter in the scene, leaves an object and leaves the scene.

Video Clip 5

3

VideoFile-26.3MB  

VideoFile-30MB  

Yes Yes Some

Multiple people leaving and picking  objects in the scene

Video Clip 6

3

VideoFile-23MB  

VideoFile-25MB  

Yes Yes Some

Multiple people leaving and picking  objects in the scene

Video Clip 7 4

VideoFile-15MB  

VideoFile-15MB  

Yes Yes -

Hall room: A single person enter in the scene, leaves an object and leaves the scene. Then another person enters and picks the object

Video Clip 8 4

VideoFile-25MB  

VideoFile-27MB  

Yes Yes Some

Train station:  A single person leaves an object. Then the object is abandoned.

Video Clip 9 4

VideoFile-14MB  

VideoFile-18MB  

Yes - Yes

Train station:  This scenario contains a person waiting for a train, the person temporarily places their briefcase on the ground before picking it up again and moving to a nearby shop.

Video Clip 10 4

VideoFile-15MB  

VideoFile-23MB  

Yes - Some Train Station: This scenario contains a person waiting for a train, the person temporarily places their briefcase on the ground before picking it up again and moving to a nearby shop.
Video Clip 11 4

VideoFile-22MB  

VideoFile-28MB  

Yes Yes Some Train station:  This scenario contains a single person with ski equipment who loiters before abandoning the item of luggage.
Video Clip 12 4

VideoFile-19MB  

VideoFile-35MB  

Yes Some Some Train station:  This scenario contains two people who enter the scene together. One person places a rucksack on the ground, before both people leave together (without the rucksack).
Video Clip 13 5

VideoFile-130MB  

VideoFile-88MB  

Yes Some Some Underground station:  This crowded scenario contains a person that places an object, abandoning it few seconds later.

 

References

[1] PETS2006, Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance dataset, 2006 (available online at: www.pets2006.org).
[2] PETS2007, Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance dataset, 2007 (available online at: www.pets2007.org).
[3] i-Lids dataset for the 4th IEEE Int. Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance, 2007 (available online at: http://www.elec.qmul.ac.uk/staffinfo/andrea/avss2007.html).
[4] VISOR, VIdeo Surveillance Online Repository, 2008 (available online at http://www.openvisor.org).
[5] The test visual material used in this publication has been provided by the ITEA CANDELA project, (available online at: http://www.multitel.be/~va/candela/).
[6] The test visual material used in this publication has been provided with courtesy of Thales Security Systems within the scope of the IST FP6 WCAM project, (available online at: http://wcam.epfl.ch/).
[7] F. Tiburzi, M. Escudero, J. Bescós, and J. M. Martínez, “A ground truth for motion-based video-object segmentation,” in Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Image Processing (Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrieval), pp. 17–20, 2008 (dataset available at: http://www-vpu.ii.uam.es/CVSG/.